Apartment manager to serve two years in jail for conning tenants of Sh2 million
Crime and Justice
By
Nancy Gitonga
| Apr 02, 2026
A Nairobi court has sentenced an apartment manager to two years in prison after he stole over Sh2 million in rent collected from tenants across three properties.
James Peter Muthoga, who worked as an assistant manager overseeing apartments in Karen, Rongai and Kitengela, was found guilty and convicted by Principal Magistrate Caroline Njagi, who handed down the two-year custodial sentence without the option of a fine.
Delivering the verdict, the magistrate ruled that the prosecution had proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Muthoga betrayed the trust placed in him by his employer, Tweya Investment Limited, by pocketing Sh2,067,740 that tenants had paid as rent.
READ MORE
World Bank approves Sh71 billion for Isiolo-Mandera road construction
Banks double lending target to small businesses to hit Sh326b
Contradictions in rural economies 13 years into devolved governance
Return of the bitter pill: Kenya softens IMF stance as Iran shock bites
Court clears way for Sh619 billion EABL shares sale
JKUAT to assemble 3,000 computers for digital hubs countrywide
Jubilee Holdings profit jumps 18 per cent on increased revenue
Why data privacy matters for Kenyan enterprises
African electric vehicle firm bets on innovation with US stock listing
How green certification is driving regional demand for warehouses
The offences, the court heard, were committed on diverse dates between June 6, 2018 and May 26, 2022, at Karen Triangle Road within Nairobi County.
Prosecutors told the court that Muthoga's theft only came to light following an audit by an expert, which revealed that a significant sum of money was unaccounted for.
Investigations established that while Muthoga had been diligently collecting rent from tenants, he had not been remitting the funds to the property owner.
When confronted by his employer over the missing money, Muthoga vanished. He later surrendered to the police at Karen Police Station.
In his defence, Muthoga denied the charges, arguing that there was no written agreement confirming he had been tasked with collecting rent from tenants.
The magistrate, however, was unconvinced, finding that Muthoga had abused his position of trust and that the money had come into his possession by virtue of his employment.